In a startling turn of events, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have once again found themselves grappling with staffing issues, as their Chief of Staff, Josh Kettler, has opted to resign after only three months in the position.
This marks the eighteenth staff member to exit the couple’s inner circle within a few short years, underscoring an ongoing challenge for the Sussexes.
Kettler joined the team with high expectations, touted as the ideal guide for Prince Harry as he navigated what was described as a pivotal phase in his life.
However, his departure has sparked curiosity and speculation regarding the dynamics behind closed doors.
Although representatives for the couple refrained from commenting on the reasons for Kettler’s exit, a source later informed People magazine that he was initially brought on board “on a trial basis.”
According to this insider, both parties reached a mutual agreement that the arrangement wasn’t yielding the desired outcomes.
Yet, Richard Eden of the Daily Mail has highlighted an interesting twist.
He recalled when Harry and Meghan asserted their commitment to avoiding anonymous briefings—an approach they claimed was in stark contrast to the traditional methods employed by the royal family.
How ironic it seems now, doesn’t it?
Eden pointed out that the recent briefing to People appears somewhat insincere, suggesting that Kettler’s employment was not merely a trial run like any other appointment might be.
His role gained significant visibility during the couple’s recent trip to Nigeria, where he remained close to Harry throughout various engagements, further indicating the importance of his position.
Adding to the intrigue, Kettler was also present at the St Paul’s Cathedral event commemorating the tenth anniversary of the Invictus Games, solidifying his role within Harry’s professional circle.
The timing of Kettler’s departure raises questions about the stability of the couple’s working relationships, especially given that the term “mutual” has been a recurring theme in recent announcements from the Sussexes.
Just as they used “mutual” to describe their split from Spotify, this choice of words suggests a desire to maintain an amicable narrative, even amidst troubling circumstances.
However, the frequency of turnover in their staffing suggests a deeper issue that may be worth exploring.
The Sussexes have encountered a revolving door of personnel
Read more
